Not every requirement has an asset behind it. A hiring round, a marketing push, a VAT or corporation tax bill, or the gap before a large contract pays are all real funding needs with nothing to secure a facility against except the business itself.
Unsecured lending answers that, and the trade is explicit. There is no charge over property, decisions come in days rather than weeks, and the price is higher and the term shorter than anything secured. It is expensive money used well, or expensive money used badly, and the difference is entirely what it funds.
Unsecured rarely means unguaranteed. Most lenders will want personal guarantees from the directors, so the risk moves from the company to the people running it rather than disappearing. That is the single most misunderstood thing about the product and it belongs in the decision, not in the small print.
The guarantee position established first
Who is being asked to guarantee, capped at what, and whether anything is charged against a home. These are terms rather than fixed conditions, and they are much easier to negotiate before an offer than after one.
Priced against the secured alternative
Where there is an asset, a secured facility is almost always cheaper. We check that first, because taking unsecured money against a business that could have borrowed against equipment or a ledger is a costly default.
Sized on what it funds, not on what is available
Serviceability is tested against your trading, and the largest facility on offer is rarely the right one. The question is what the money returns, not what a lender will advance.
Repayment shape
Fixed monthly instalments, or a facility repaid as a share of card takings for a retail or hospitality business. The second flexes with a bad month, which is worth real money in a seasonal trade.